4.7 Article

Renal Transcriptome Analysis of Programmed Hypertension Induced by Maternal Nutritional Insults

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 17826-17837

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms160817826

关键词

developmental programming; diabetes; fructose; hypertension; next generation sequencing; nutrition

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 101-2314-B-182A-021-MY3]
  2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan [CMRPG8C0042, CMRPG8D0202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maternal nutrition can affect development, leading to long-term effects on the health of offspring. The most common outcome is programmed hypertension. We examined whether alterations in renal transcriptome are responsible for generating programmed hypertension among four different models using next-generation RNA sequencing (NGS) technology. Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats received 50% caloric restriction (CR), intraperitoneal injection of 45 mg/kg streptozotocin, 60% high-fructose (HF) diet, or 1% NaCl in drinking water to conduct CR, diabetes, HF, or high-salt models, respectively. All four models induced programmed hypertension in adult male offspring. We observed 16 shared genes in a two-week-old kidney among four different models. The identified differential expressed genes (DEGs) that are related to the regulation of blood pressure included Adrb3, Alb, Apoe, Calca, Kng1, Adm2, Guca2b, Hba2, Hba-a2, and Ppara. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling pathway and glutathione metabolism pathway were shared by the CR, diabetes, and HF models. Conclusively, a variety of maternal nutritional insults induced the same phenotypeprogrammed hypertension with differential alterations of renal transcriptome in adult male offspring. The roles of DEGs identified by the NGS in this study deserve further clarification to develop ideal maternal dietary interventions and thus spare the next generations from the burden of hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据