4.8 Article

Enhanced Detection of Sialylated and Sulfated Glycans with Negative Ion Mode Nanoliquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry at High pH

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 82, 期 4, 页码 1470-1477

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac902602e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [7461, 21027, 342-2004-4434]
  2. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  3. Knutand Alice Wallenberg Foundation [KAW2007.0118]
  4. IngaBritt and Arne Lundberg Foundation
  5. Sahlgren's University Hospital
  6. EU-FP7 IBDase
  7. Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren's Foundation
  8. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research-The Mucosal Immunobiology and Vaccine Center (MI-VAC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Negative ion mode nanoliquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (nano-LC/MS) on porous graphitic carbon columns at pH 11 was studied and compared to capillary LC/MS at pH 8 for the analysis of neutral and acidic glycan alditols. Oligosaccharides were chromatographed with an acetonitrile gradient containing 0.04% ammonium hydroxide and analyzed with a linear ion trap mass spectrometer (LTQ) equipped with a modified nanospray interface. Analysis of acidic N- and O-glycan standards revealed that good quality MS/MS spectra could be obtained when loading 1-3 fmol, a 10-fold increase in sensitivity compared to capillary-LC/MS at pH 8. Analysis of a complex mixture of O-glycans from porcine colonic mucins with nano-LC/MS and MS/MS at high pH revealed 170 oligosaccharides in one analysis, predominantly corresponding to sulfated glycans with up to 11 residues. Analysis of the same sample with capillary-LC/MS showed a lower sensitivity for multiply sulfated glycans. Nano-LC/MS of O-linked oligosaccharides on MUC2 from a human colon biopsy also illustrated that the ionization of oligosaccharides with multiple sialic acid groups was increased compared to those with only one sialic acid residue. Nano-LC/MS at high pH is, thus, a highly sensitive approach for the analysis of acidic oligosaccharides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据