4.6 Article

Kidney dysfunction as a risk factor for first symptomatic stroke events in a general Japanese population - the Ohasama study

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 1910-1915

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm051

关键词

chronic kidney disease; Japanese general population; stroke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) has been shown to be a risk factor for mortality as well as for morbidity such as cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population. However, in the context of CVD events, there is a difference in the incidence of cardiac and stroke events between Western and Asian populations. Although a high prevalence of stroke is a characteristic feature in Japanese populations, it is unclear whether CKD, constitutes a risk for stroke events. Methods. To clarify this issue, we estimated creatinine clearance and obtained dipstick tests from spot-urine samples in 1977 subjects (mean 62.9-years-old, men/women: 731/1246) from a general Japanese population. First symptomatic stroke events and all-cause mortality were analysed according to stratification of kidney function and by positive tests for macroalbuminuria using a Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for possible confounding factors. Results. During the observation period (mean 7.76 years), we recorded 112 events of first symptomatic stroke and 187 deaths (58 cases due to CVD). After adjustment for all variables, we found that increases in relative hazard (RH) for the first symptomatic stroke events were associated with decreasing kidney function (RH, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.24-7.84 in Ccr < 40ml/min, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.06-3.75 in Ccr 40-70ml/min, ref in Ccr > 70 ml/min) and with the presence of macroalbuminuria (RH, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.80-2.41). Conclusion. Decreased kidney function increased the risk of first symptomatic stroke events in a general Japanese population. The high prevalence of stroke in this population prompts the need for greater public awareness about risks for CKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据