4.8 Article

Microplasma Discharge Ionization Source for Ambient Mass Spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 82, 期 2, 页码 621-627

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac901964m

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bio-Imaging Mass Spectrometry (BIMS) Center at the Georgia Institute of Technology
  2. NSF [0645094]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Chemistry [0645094] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we demonstrate the first use of a microplasma ionization source for ambient mass spectrometry. Ibis device is a robust, easy-to-operate microhollow discharge that enables ambient direct analysis of gaseous, liquid, and solid-phase samples with minimum requirements in terms of operating power and high purity gas consumption. The initial performance of the microplasma device has been evaluated by ionizing samples containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dimethylformamide (DMF), methyl salicylate, caffeine, L-leucine, L-histidine, loratadine, ibuprofen, acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid, and cocaine in various forms. These molecules are diverse in nature, but almost all have relatively high proton affinities, Thus, the major species observed in all obtained mass spectra corresponded to protonated molecules. Though these microplasmas are known to produce significant densities of metastable species and electrons with mean energies greater than several electronvolt, minimal fragmentation was observed. Background spectra showed prominent signals corresponding to H+(H2O)(2) ions and a distinct lack of H3O+. Small water cluster ions are likely the dominant proton transfer agents, giving rise to mass spectral data very similar to that obtained using other plasma-based ambient ionization techniques. The simplicity, low cost, low power, low rate of gas consumption, and possibility of being batch-fabricated, makes these microplasma devices attractive candidates as ion sources for miniaturized mass spectrometry and other field detection applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据