4.8 Article

Sensitive DNA-Based Electrochemical Strategy for Trace Bleomycin Detection

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 82, 期 19, 页码 8272-8277

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac101761q

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [20776039, 21075040]
  2. Shanghai Project [09JC1404100]
  3. SKLBE [2060204]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bleomycins (BLMs) are widely used in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of a variety of cancers. The clinical application of BLMs is featured by the occurrence of sometimes fatal side effects, such as renal and lung toxicity, and the potential dose-limiting side effect of pulmonary fibrosis. Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop a sensitive method to quantitatively determine the BLM content in both pharmaceutical analysis and clinical samples, to make full use of therapeutic efficacy and to weaken its toxicity. Here, we proposed a simple, rapid, and convenient electrochemical assay for trace BLM detection. A reported DNA motif, as substrate for BLMs, is prepared to self-assemble onto the gold electrode to fabricate an electrochemical DNA (E-DNA) sensor, with a terminus tethered on the electrode surface and the other terminus labeled with ferrocenyl moiety as a signal reporter to form a stem-loop structure, giving an arise of remarkable faradaic current. In the presence of Fe(II)center dot BLM, the E-DNA sensor undergoes the irreversible cleavage event, which can be transduced into a significant decrease in current peak. This proposed sensor reveals an impressive sensitivity as low as 100 pM BLMs and exhibits a good performance as well as in serum sample. Considering the high sensitivity and specificity of this proposed sensor, as well as the cost-effective and simple-to-implement features of the electrochemical technique, we believe that this method shows distinct advantages over conventional methods and it is a promising alternative for the determination of trace amounts of BLMs in clinical samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据