4.8 Article

Structural Characterization of Phospholipids and Peptides Directly from Tissue Sections by MALDI Traveling-Wave Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 82, 期 5, 页码 1881-1889

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac9026115

关键词

-

资金

  1. MALDI SYNAPT HDMS
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH-05-01-0179]
  3. NIH/NIGMS [5R01GM58008-10]
  4. Vanderbilt University College of Arts and Sciences
  5. Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology
  6. Vanderbilt Institute of Integrative Biosystems Research and Education
  7. Ionwerks Inc.
  8. Defense Threat Reduction Agency [HDTRA1-09-1-0013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) provides rapid two-dimensional separations based on analyte apparent surface area or collision cross section (CCS, angstrom(2)) and mass-to-charge, respectively. Recently, traveling-wave (t-wave) IM-MS was developed which uses electrodynamic rather than electrostatic fields commonly used in drift cell IM-MS instruments. The underlying theory for obtaining CCS data is well developed for drift cell IM-MS, while strategies for obtaining CCS values from t-wave IM-MS data remains an active area of research. In this report, methods were developed and validated to obtain CCS values of phospholipids and peptides directly from thin tissue sections by MALDI t-wave IM-MS using CCS calibrants measured by MALDI drift cell IM-MS. Importantly, the average percent difference between t-wave kind drift cell CCS measurements, is minimized by calibrating with the same biomolecular class. Calibrating t-wave phospholipid CCS values with drift cell peptide CCS measurements results in an average percent difference of ca. 7% between the same lipids measured using t-wave kind drift cell IM-MS, while this improves to <0.5% when drift cell phospholipid CCS values are used for calibrating t-wave data. A suite of CCS values are reported for lipids and peptides that were determined directly from tissue, i.e. without the need for tissue extraction and further purification steps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据