4.5 Article

Insulin protects liver cells from saturated fatty acid-induced apoptosis via inhibition of c-Jun NH2 terminal kinase activity

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 148, 期 7, 页码 3338-3345

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2006-1710

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-072017, DK-47416] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatocyte apoptosis is increased in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and correlates with disease severity. Long-chain saturated fatty acids, such as palmitate and stearate, induce apoptosis in liver cells. The present study examined insulin-mediated protection against saturated fatty acid-induced apoptosis in the rat hepatoma cell line, H4IIE, and primary rat hepatocytes. Cells were provided a control media ( no fatty acids) or the same media containing 250 mu mol/liter of albumin-bound oleate or palmitate for 16 h. Insulin concentrations were 0, 1, 10, or 100 nmol/liter ( n = 4 - 6/treatment). Palmitate, but not oleate, activated caspase-3 and induced DNA fragmentation in the absence of insulin. Insulin reduced palmitate-mediated activation of caspase-3 and DNA fragmentation in a dose-dependent manner. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors abolished these effects of insulin. Insulin-mediated inhibition of palmitate-induced apoptosis was not due to an augmentation in the unfolded protein response or increased expression of genes encoding the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, inhibitor of apoptosis protein-2 and X-linked mammalian inhibitor of apoptosis protein. Palmitate, but not oleate, increased c-Jun NH2 terminal kinase activity in the absence of insulin. Insulin or SP600125, a chemical inhibitor of c-Jun NH2 terminal kinase, blocked palmitate-mediated activation of c-Jun NH2 terminal kinase and reduced apoptosis. These data suggest that insulin is an important determinant of saturated fatty acid-induced apoptosis in liver cells and may have implications for fatty acid-mediated liver cell injury in insulin-deficient and/or - resistant states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据