3.8 Review

Mechanisms of Disease:: the developmental origins of disease and the role of the epigenotype

期刊

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncpendmet0531

关键词

birth weight; diabetes; epigenetics; nutrition; programming

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E00797X/1, BB/D01235X/1, BB/D007909/1, BB/D01235X/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Medical Research Council [G0600717B] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. BBSRC [BB/D007909/1, BB/D01235X/1, BB/D01235X/2, BB/E00797X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D01235X/1, BB/D01235X/2, BB/D007909/1, BB/E00797X/1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is accumulating evidence that many chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease might originate during early life. This evidence gives rise to the developmental origins of disease hypothesis, an is supported by epidemiological data in humans and experimental animal models. A perturbed environment in early life is thought to elicit a range of physiological and cellular adaptive responses in key organ systems. These adaptive changes result in permanent alterations and might lead to pathology in later life. Aging organs and cells seem therefore to retain a 'memory' of their fetal history and adaptive responses. The mechanisms underlying the developmental origins of disease remain poorly defined. Epigenetic tagging of genes, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, controls the function of the genome at different levels and maintains cellular memory after many cellular divisions; importantly, tagging can be modulated by the environment and is involved in onset of diseases such as cancer. Here we review the evidence for the developmental origins of disease and discuss the role of the epigenotype as a contributing mechanism. Environmentally induced changes in the epigenotype might be key primary events in the developmental origins of disease, with important clinical implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据