4.8 Article

Continuous-Flow Polymerase Chain Reaction of Single-Copy DNA in Microfluidic Microdroplets

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 81, 期 1, 页码 302-306

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac802038c

关键词

-

资金

  1. RCUK Basic Technology Programme
  2. EU NEST project MiFem
  3. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Beacon award Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  4. Schering Foundation
  5. Cambridge Overseas Trust and Trinity Hall, Cambridge
  6. Trinity College, Cambridge
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  8. EPSRC [EP/D048664/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D048664/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a high throughput microfluidic device for continuous-flow polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in water-in-oil droplets of nanoliter volumes. The circular design of this device allows droplets to pass through alternating temperature zones and complete 34 cycles of PCR in only 17 min, avoiding temperature cycling of the entire device. The temperatures for the applied two-temperature PCR protocol can be adjusted according to requirements of template and primers. These temperatures were determined with fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) inside the droplets, exploiting the temperature-dependent fluorescence lifetime of rhodamine B. The successful amplification of an 85 base-pair long template from four different start concentrations was demonstrated. Analysis of the product by gel-electrophoresis, sequencing, and real-time PCR showed that the amplification is specific and the amplification factors of up to 5 x 10(6)-fold are comparable to amplification factors obtained in a benchtop PCR machine. The high efficiency allows amplification from a single molecule of DNA per droplet. This device holds promise for convenient integration with other microfluidic devices and adds a critical missing component to the laboratory-on-a-chip toolkit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据