4.5 Article

Radio-telemetric monitoring of dispersing stag beetles: implications for conservation

期刊

JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
卷 272, 期 3, 页码 235-243

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00282.x

关键词

Lucanus cervus; radio telemetry; connectivity of local populations; Germany; dispersal threshold; flight behaviour; weather

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Migratory movements of the endangered stag beetles Lucanus ccrvus (18 males, 38 females) were monitored radio-telemetrically for three reproductive periods (2003-2005). The aim of the study was to estimate the migratory range of free-ranging individuals as a measure of connectivity among neighbouring populations for future conservation measures. Miniature transmitters of c. 350 mg (battery life: 10-15 days) were attached externally to the pronotum. Transmitter/beetle mass ratio was 12.8% on average (7.1-28.0%). Male dispersal behaviour consisted of frequent flights directed to sites with reproductive females and rarely of on-ground movement. Total displacement distance recorded was up to 2065 m, the maximum distance of a single flight being 1720 m. Flights always began at elevated structures such as trees and shrubs and took place in an air temperature range of 11-27 degrees C. Within this range, temperature did not influence flight distance. Female dispersal behaviour consisted mostly of a single flight, followed by mating and consequent ground movements towards oviposition sites. Total displacement distance recorded was up to 762.6 m, the maximum distance of a single flight being 701 in. Climatic constraints of flights were the same as in males. Modelling the dispersal behaviour suggests that about 1% of males are capable of maintaining gene flux among nest sites within a radius of about 3 km. However, the colonization of new nest sites depends on the dispersal ability of females and amounts to less than I km. Thus, isolated populations (distance to the next population greater than 3 km) have an increased probability of local extinction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据