4.5 Article

Pathways utilized by dendritic cells for binding, uptake, processing and presentation of antigens derived from HIV-1

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 37, 期 7, 页码 1752-1763

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200636981

关键词

antigen pathway; antigen presentation; antigen processing; dendritic cells; HIV

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [N01 CO12400] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI61684, F32 AI058457, F32 AI058457-03, AI52731, AI57127, AI55274, AI44628] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The outcome following HIV infection depends on the nature and durability of the HIV-specific T cell response induced initially. The activation of protective T cell responses depends upon dendritic cells (DC), antigen-presenting cells which have the capacity to process and present viral antigens. DC pulsed with aldrithiol-2-inactivated HIV and delivered in vivo were reported to induce immune responses and promote virologic control in chronically HIV-1-infected subjects. To gain an understanding of this phenomenon, we characterized the steps involved in the presentation of antigens derived from aldrithiol-2-treated vs. infectious HIV-1 by DC. Antigen presentation, on both MHC class I and II, was independent of DC-specific ICAM-3-grabbing integrin, DEC-205 and macrophage mannose receptor, C-type lectins expressed by the DC. Inhibitor studies showed that presentation on MHC class I was dependent on viral fusion in a CD4/coreceptor-dependent manner, both at the cell surface and within endosomes, and access to the classical endosomal processing pathway. MHC class II presentation of HIV-associated antigens was dependent on active endocytosis, probably receptor-mediated, and subsequent degradation of virions in acidified endosomes in the DC. Our study brings forth new facts regarding the binding, uptake, and processing of chemically inactivated virions leading to efficient antigen presentation and should aid in the design of more effective HIV vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据