4.7 Article

Remote organ injury induced by myocardial ischemia and reperfusion on reproductive organs, and protective effect of melatonin in male rats

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 188-192

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.068

关键词

melatonin; myocardial ischemia and reperfusion; oxidative stress; sperm characteristics; remote organ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (MI-R) leads to remote organ injury associated with oxidative stress. Melatonin is a well-known antioxidant and free-radical scavenger. This study was conducted to examine whether MI-R causes damage in the testes and sperm quality, and to investigate the possible protective effect of exogenous melatonin on these parameters in an in vivo rat model. Design: Experimental study. Setting: Experimental Research Center, Firat University Medical School, Elazig, Turkey. Patient(s): Eight-week-old male Wistar rats (n = 18). Intervention(s): To produce MI-R, a branch of descending left coronary artery was occluded for 30 minutes, followed by 120-minute reperfusion. Melatonin (10 mg/kg) or vehicle was given 10 minutes before ischemia via the jugular vein. Main Outcome Measure(s): Reproductive organ weights and epididymal sperm concentration, sperm motility, abnormal sperm rate, and testicular-tissue malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) levels were examined after reperfusion. Result(s): MI-R significantly decreased epididymal sperm motility, and increased the tests-tissue level of MDA, compared to the control group. Administration of melatonin reversed the harmful effects of MI-R significantly. However, MI-R did not change sperm concentration, GSH levels, and reproductive organ weights. Conclusion(s): These findings indicate that MI-R leads to damage of testis and sperm motility, and melatonin protects againsts MI-R-induced reproductive-organ injury. These results may also encourage the use of antioxidants to reduce remove organ injury in the testis after MI-R.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据