4.8 Article

Improved Measurement of Ozone and Carbonyls Using a Dual-Bed Sampling Cartridge Containing trans-1,2-Bis(2-pyridyl)ethylene and 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine-Impregnated Silica

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 81, 期 15, 页码 6552-6557

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac9011528

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of the Japanese Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously developed a new method using trans-1,2-bis-(4-pyridyl)ethylene (4-BPE) and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) for the simultaneous determination of ozone and carbonyls in air using a two-bed cartridge In this method, 4-BPE was used to capture ozone. However, the method suffered from long reaction times, in the eluate, low solubility of the DNPH derivative, and a strong dependence on atmospheric moisture. These problems could be overcome by using trans-1,2-bis-(2-pyridyl)ethylene (2-BPE) in place of 4-BPE. The efficiency of the reaction of ozone with 2-BPE to form pyridine-2-aldehyde (2PA) is higher than the corresponding reaction with 4-BPE. Under the optimized elution conditions, the reaction times of 2PA and 4PA with DNPH are within 15 and 120 min, respectively. In the elution from the sampling cartridge, 2PA formed from 2-BPE and ozone is easier to dissolve in the elution solvent. A stronger influence of humidity was observed in ozone recovery by the 4-BPE/DNPH method. 2-BPE exhibits a maximum reaction efficiency of 84% at 32% relative humidity (RH), while 4-BPE attains a maximum reaction efficiency of 82% at 49% RH. Humidity has much less influence on the reaction of 2-BPE with ozone. Above 18% RH, the reaction efficiency of 2-BPE with ozone is in the range 80-84%. Thus, 2-BPE is the more useful reagent for ozone analysis. The concentrations of ozone and carbonyls by the improved 2-BPE/DNPH method corresponded with the mean value by an ozone auto analyzer in an air monitoring station and a DNPH cartridge coupled with a KI-ozone scrubbing cartridge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据