4.8 Article

Absolute Quantification of Phosphorylation on the Kinase Activation Loop of Cellular Focal Adhesion Kinase by Stable Isotope Dilution Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 81, 期 9, 页码 3304-3313

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac900204f

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01CA95586, P30ES013508, T32HL007954]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A vital point of convergence for many signaling pathways at cellular focal adhesions is the interaction of two nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and Src. The binding of Src to FAK leads to the phosphorylation of Y-576 and Y-577, located within the activation loop domain of FAK However, it has not been possible previously to determine the absolute quantitative relationship between phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of this activation loop domain in cells undergoing normal metabolism. We have developed a stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography-multiple reaction monitoring/mass spectrometry (LC-MRM/MS) technique that allows such determinations to be made. Isotopically labeled and phosphorylated FAK protein standards were synthesized and used to control for loss during immunoprecipitation of FAK. A control tryptic peptide, representing an unmodified region of FAK, was employed to monitor the mass balance of post-translational modifications (PTMs) on the activation loop domain. Absolute quantification was conducted using stable isotope labeled peptide standards with four endogenous amino acid overhangs at the trypsin digestion sites of both the amino and carboxy terminus. The LC-MRM/MS method was rigorously validated,using in vitro kinase assays and employed to conduct absolute quantification of FAK phosphorylation in normal mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). This methodology will have particular utility for biomarker studies of kinase-inhibiting anticancer drugs and for quantitative proteomic investigations that examine kinase and phosphatase-mediated cellular signal transduction pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据