期刊
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 54-61出版社
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.04.008
关键词
economics; exercise; health promotion; physical fitness; primary prevention; randomized controlled trials
Objective. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of non-face-to-face interventions for increasing physical activity in sedentary adults. The took place in Providence, Rhode Island between the years 2000 and 2004. Methods. Two hundred and thirty-nine participants were randomized to Phone, Print or a contact control. Phone and Print groups were regular surveys regarding their level of physical activity, motivational readiness and self-efficacy. Surveys were scanned by a computer system to generate feedback reports. Phone group participants received feedback by telephone. Print group participants received feedback by The contact control group received mailings unrelated to physical activity. Intervention costs were assessed prospectively, from a payer Physical activity was measured using the 7-day Physical Activity Recall. Ambulatory health service use was assessed via monthly surveys. Results. The Print intervention was more economically efficient than the Phone intervention in engaging participants in a more active Conclusion. The Print intervention provides an efficient approach to increasing physical activity. Research is needed to determine the effectiveness of the intervention in a more diverse population, within the context of the health service delivery system and over a longer period time. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据