4.5 Article

Multivariate prognostic study on large gastric cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 96, 期 1, 页码 14-18

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.20631

关键词

stomach; cancer; gastric cancer; large gastric cancer; prognosis; survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Although many authors investigate the prognostic factors of gastric cancer, there are few comprehensive. studies on the prognosis of patients with large gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic factors of large gastric cancer using multivariate analysis. Methods: The study included 95 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer measuring 10 cm or more in diameter. We examined 24 clinicopathologic factors based on patient, operation, and tumor findings. Survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier and Mantel-Cox method, and multivariate analysis was done using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Overall 5-year survival rate was 22%, and median survival period was 15 months: The 5-year survival-rate was influenced by the tumor size, gross type, serosal invasion, extragastric lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, peritoneal dissemination, stage of disease (I, II vs. III, IV), resection margin, and operative curability (R0 vs. R1, R2). Of these, independent prognostic factors were three tumor findings: serosal invasion (absent vs. present, odds ratio 3.06, P < 0.01), extragastric lymph node metastasis (absent vs. present, odds ratio 2.13, P < 0.05), and liver metastasis (absent vs. present, odds ratio 3.77, P < 0.05). The survival was not significantly associated with any of the patient factors or operation factors including the extent of lymph node dissection. Conclusion: In patients with large gastric cancer, independent prognostic factors were serosal invasion, extragastric lymph node metastasis, and liver metastasis. Prognosis after gastectomy was determined by these tumor factors and was not associated with the patient or operation factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据