4.8 Article

Interactions between Signal-Transducing Proteins Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 81, 期 9, 页码 3276-3284

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac8024366

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRC
  2. Korean government (MEST) [R15-2004-033-06001-0]
  3. National R&D Program for Cancer Control
  4. Ministry of Health Welfare [0620200]
  5. Brain Korea 21 program
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [R15-2004-033-06001-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used to study the specific interactions between the signal-transducing proteins mammalian phospholipase D1 (PLD1), phospholipase C-gamma 1 (PLC-gamma 1), and Munc-18-1. To record the forces between them, the Phox homology (PX) domain of PLD1, the Src homology (SH3) domain of PLC-gamma 1, and Munc-18-1 were fused with glutathione S-transferase (GST) and immobilized onto reduced glutathione (GSH)-tethered surfaces. In order to enhance the recognition efficiency and avoid undesirable complications, both AFM tips and substrates were first modified with dendrons of two different sizes. Under the employed conditions, the probability of observing an unbinding event increased, most force-distance curves showed the single rupture events, and the unbinding forces were 51 +/- 2 pN for PX-(Munc-18-1) and 42 +/- 2 pN for PX-SH3. To investigate dynamics of these biomolecular interactions, we measured the loading rate dependence of the unbinding forces. The unbinding forces increased linearly with the logarithm of the loading rate, indicating the presence of a single potential barrier in the dissociation energy landscape. The measured off-rate constants (k(off)) at 15 degrees C were 10(-3.4) (+/-) (0.3) s(-1) for PX-(Munc-18-1) and 10(-1.7 +/- 0.1) s(-1) for PX-SH3. Further, we elucidated the influence of free SH3 and Munc-18-1 on the specific PX-(Munc-18-1) and PX-SH3 interaction, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据