4.5 Article

Response inhibition predicts poor antidepressant treatment response in very old depressed patients

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 553-563

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3180302513

关键词

vascular depression; late-onset depression; executive dysfunction; cerebrovascular disease; treatment outcome; geriatric depression

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [K23 MH075006, T32 MH020004, T32 MH20004] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: There have been mixed findings regarding the prognostic significance of age of onset, executive dysfunction, and hyperintensity burden on treatment outcome in late-life depression. Methods: Growth curve models were fit to data from the only 8-week, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of citalopram ( 20 - 40 mg/day) in patients aged 75 years and older with unipolar depression. Baseline assessment included Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) ( to determine age at onset), Stroop Color-Word Test ( to assess the response inhibition component of execution dysfunction), and structural magnetic resonance imaging ( to determine hyperintensity burden). Results: In the citalopram condition, patients with response inhibition ( most impaired quartile) scored higher at endpoint than those without response inhibition. There were no effects for age of onset or hyperintensity load on response in the citalopram condition. In the placebo condition, patients with early-onset depression had higher depression scores at endpoint than patients with late-onset depression. Conclusion: Only response inhibition, a fundamental executive function, predicted poor treatment response to antidepressant medication. Although patients with response inhibition also showed deficits in reaction time, adjusting for reaction time in our final response inhibition model did not substantively change the findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据