4.8 Article

Functional Nanoparticle-Based Proteomic Strategies for Characterization of Pathogenic Bacteria

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 80, 期 24, 页码 9612-9621

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac802042x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Council (NSC) of Taiwan
  2. MOE-ATU [96W821G021, 96W801H109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI MS) can be employed to rapidly characterize pathogenic bacteria, bacterial cultures are generally required to obtain sufficient quantities of the bacterial cells prior to MALDI MS analysis. If this time-consuming step could be eliminated, the length of time required for identification of bacterial strains would be greatly reduced. In this paper, we propose an effective means of rapidly identifying bacteria-one that does not require bacterial culturing-using functional nanoparticle-based proteomic strategies that are characterized by extremely short analysis time. In this approach, we used titania-coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4@TiO2 NPs) as affinity probes to concentrate the target bacteria. The magnetic properties of the Fe3O4@TiO2 NPs allow the conjugated target species to be rapidly isolated from the sample solutions under a magnetic field. Taking advantage of the absorption of the magnetic Fe3O4 NPs in the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum, we performed the tryptic digestion of the captured bacteria under microwave heating for only 1-1.5 min prior to MALDI MS analysis. We identified the resulting biomarker ions by combining their MS/MS analysis results with protein database searches. Using this technique, we identified potential biomarker ions representing five Gram-negative bacteria: Escherichia coli O157:H7, uropathogenic E. coli, Shigella sonnei, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Finally, we demonstrated the practical feasibility of using this approach to rapidly characterize bacteria in clinical samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据