4.1 Article

Do regulatory T cells contribute to Th1 skewness in obesity?

期刊

出版社

JOHANN AMBROSIUS BARTH VERLAG MEDIZINVERLAGE HEIDELBERG GMBH
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-960494

关键词

obesity; regulatory T cell; Foxp3; Th1; cytokine; dendritic cell; monocyte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recent data suggest that an increased prevalence of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) producing CD4(+) cells is present in obesity. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have a strong impact on activation and proliferation of CD4(+) lymphocytes. Data are not available about Tregs and their possible contribution to chronic mild inflammation in obesity. Design: We investigated the prevalence of Tregs in obese children. We also collected data about dendritic cells and monocytes (so-called antigen presenting cells, APCs), important modulators of Tregs and we determined the cytokine production of CD4(+) lymphocytes, the main target cells of Tregs. Methods: Twelve obese children and 10 healthy age-matched controls have been enrolled. For flow cytometric analyses, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were used. We determined the prevalence of Tregs by Foxp3 expression of CD4(+) cells; prevalence of myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DCs); prevalence of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin(IL)-12 producing monocytes; and prevalence of IL-2, IL4 and IFN-gamma producing CD4(+) cells. Results: The prevalence of Tregs, DCs, TNF-alpha and IL-12 producing macrophages, IL-2 and IFN-alpha producing CD4(+) cells was similar in both groups. The prevalence of IL-4 producing CD4(+) cells was lower in obese children than in healthy controls (p=0.028). The ratio of IFN-gamma(+)/ IL-4(+) CD4(+) cells was higher in obese children than in those with normal weight (p = 0.046). Conclusions: CD4(+) reactions are polarized toward Th1 direction in obesity. The unaltered number of Treg and APCs suggests that these immune regulator cells do not contribute to altered immune status in obese children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据