4.8 Article

Tandem mass spectrometry characteristics of silver-cationized polystyrenes: Internal energy, size, and chain end versus backbone substituent effects

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 355-362

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac701917x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Ag+ adducts of polystyrene (PS) oligomers with different sizes (6-19 repeat units) and initiating (alpha) or terminating (omega) end groups mainly decompose via free radical chemistry pathways upon collisionally activated dissociation. This reactivity is observed for ions formed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization as well as electrospray ionization. With end groups lacking weak bonds (robust end groups), dissociation starts with random homolytic C-C bond cleavages along the PS chain, which lead to primary and benzylic radical ions containing either of the chain ends. The primary radical ions mainly depolymerize by successive beta C-C bond scissions. For the benzylic radical ions, two major pathways are in competition, namely, depolymerization by successive beta C-C bond scissions and backbiting via 1,5-H rearrangement followed by beta C-C bond scissions. The extent of backbiting decreases with internal energy. With short PS chains, the primary radical ions also undergo backbiting involving 1,4- and 1,6-H rearrangements; however, this process becomes negligible with longer chains. If the polystyrene contains a labile substituent at a chain end, this substituent is eliminated easily and, thus, not contained in the majority of observed fragments. Changes in the PS backbone structure can have a dramatic effect on the resulting dissociation chemistry. This is demonstrated for poly(alpha-methylstyrene), in which backbiting is obstructed due to the lack of benzylic H atoms; instead, this backbone connectivity promotes 1,2-phenyl shifts in the primary radical ions formed after initial C-C bond homolyses as well as H atom transfers between the incipient primary and benzylic radicals emerging from these homolyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据