4.8 Article

Effect of first-dimension undersampling on effective peak capacity in comprehensive two-dimensional separations

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 461-473

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac071504j

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM54585] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this work is to establish a means of correcting the theoretical maximum peak capacity of comprehensive two-dimensional (2D) separations to account for the deleterious effect of undersampling first-dimension peaks. Simulations of comprehensive 2D separations of hundreds of randomly distributed sample constituents were carried out, and 2D statistical overlap theory was used to calculate an effective first-dimension peak width based on the number of observed peaks in the simulated separations. The distinguishing feature of this work is the determination of the effective first-dimension peak width using the number of observed peaks in the entire 2D separation as the defining metric of performance. We find that the ratio of the average effective first-dimension peak width after sampling to its width prior to sampling (defined as ) is a simple function of the ratio of the first-dimension sampling time (t(s)) to the first-dimension peak standard deviation prior to sampling ((1)sigma): =root 1+0.21(t(s)/(1)sigma)(2) This is valid for 2D separations of constituents having either randomly distributed or weakly correlated retention times,. over the range of 0.2 <= t(s)/(1)sigma <= 16. The dependence of on t(s)/(1)sigma or from this expression is in qualitative agreement with previous work based on the effect of undersampling on the effective width of a single first-dimension peak, but predicts up to 35% more broadening of first-dimension peaks than is predicted by previous models. This simple expression and accurate estimation of the effect of undersampling first-dimension peaks should be very useful in making realistic corrections to theoretical 2D peak capacities, and in guiding the optimization of 2D separations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据