4.6 Article

Epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-β1 enhance HK-2 cell migration through a synergistic increase of matrix metalloproteinase and sustained activation of ERK signaling pathway

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 313, 期 11, 页码 2367-2377

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.03.022

关键词

epidermal growth factor; transforming growth factor; matrix metalloproteinase; extracellular signal; regulated kinase; cell migration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1), upregulated in renal diseases, have a combinational effect on epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) of renal proximal tubular cells. The aim of this study was to examine the mechanism regarding the combinational effect of EGF and TGF-beta 1 on cell migration following EMT. The results demonstrated that EGF (10 ng/ml) and TGF-beta 1 (3 ng/ml) synergistically increased cell migration, accompanied by an increase in matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) gene expression, production and activity. Inhibition of MMP-9 production and activity by an MMP-2/MMP-9-specific inhibitor blocked the synergistic effect of EGF and TGF-beta 1 on cell migration. The kinetic profile of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signals demonstrated that ERK1/2 activation was rapidly and strongly induced by EGF but delayed and less marked by TGF-beta 1 stimulation. In contrast, co-administration of EGF and TGF-beta 1 caused an early pronounced and persistent ERK1/2 activation. Inhibition of the ERK1/2 activity by PD98059 abrogated the synergistic effect of EGF and TGF-beta 1 on cell migration, MMP-9 production and activity, indicating that EGF and TGF-beta 1 converged at the ERK signaling pathway to mediate cell migration. This study demonstrates that EGF and TGF-beta 1 synergistically stimulate proximal tubular cell migration through the increased MMP-9 function and enhanced ERK1/2 activation. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据