4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Breakdown properties and sensory perception of whey proteins/polysaccharide mixed gels as a function of microstructure

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 21, 期 5-6, 页码 961-976

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.08.017

关键词

microstructure; mixed gels; whey proteins; polysaccharides; fracture mechanisms; serum; sensory; correlation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whey protein isolate (WPI)/polysaccharide mixed gels used in the current study formed homogeneous and phase separated microstructures as visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The latter can be further classified into protein continuous, bicontinuous and coarse stranded micro structures. Quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) was used to evaluate sensory properties of the gels. The gels were subjected to large deformations by uniaxial compression. The microstructure affects the gels breakdown properties as well as serum release which occurred during compression of the gels. Protein continuous and bicontinuous gels fractured through the protein network. They fractured along only a few crack planes, whereas in coarse stranded gels cracks were formed at many places which was accompanied by coarsening of the protein network. Serum release was strongly correlated with gels porosity. Highly porous gels, i.e., bicontinuous and coarse stranded ones, released higher amount of serum than the other gels. In addition, serum release affected large deformation and fracture properties of the gels. QDA panel tests showed that breakdown mechanisms and serum release were the major factors in sensory perception of the gels. Gels fracturing only along a few planes were perceived as firm and crumbly whereas gels showing multiple fracture events were perceived as spreadable. Gels releasing high amount of serum were perceived as watery. The study confirmed the essential role of microstructure in sensory perception of mixed gels. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据