4.8 Article

Dextran-coated gold nanoparticles for the assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 80, 期 4, 页码 1033-1038

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac701969u

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 101781] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacteria rapidly evolve mechanisms to become resistant to antibiotics. Therefore, identifying an effective antibiotic or antibacterial agent and administering it at concentrations that will successfully prevent bacterial growth (antimicrobial susceptibility) is critical for health care decision making and vital for the battle against multi-drug-resistant bacteria. Currently, the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility requires at least 24 h. Herein, we describe a nanoparticle-based antimicrobial susceptibility assay based on the concanavalin A-induced clustering of dextran-coated gold nanoparticles, which sense the presence of available complex carbohydrates in bacterial suspension. Under conditions of bacterial growth inhibition, addition of concanavalin A results in the formation of extensive dextran gold narroassemblies, Which are facilitated by the presence of free carbohydrates in solution and result in large shifts in the surface plasmon band of the nanoparticles. Meanwhile, at conditions of increased bacterial growth, a decrease in the amount of free carbohydrates in solution will occur due to an increased carbohydrate uptake by the proliferating bacteria. Ibis will result in a decrease in the size of the gold nanoparticle clusters and an increase in the number of nanoparticles that bind to bacterial surface carbohydrates, causing lower shifts in the plasmonic band. The gold nanoparticle-based assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility yields results Within 3 h and can be used for the high-throughput screening of samples during epidemics and identification of potential antimicrobial agents to expedite clinical decision-making in point-of-care diagnostics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据