4.8 Article

Anion-exchange chromatographic separation of Hg for isotope ratio measurements by multicollector ICPMS

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 80, 期 7, 页码 2548-2555

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac702190d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A procedure is described for precise Hg isotope ratio measurements by solution nebulization multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC- ICPMS). Hg was released from geological samples using aqua regia extraction and then separated from other matrix elements with the aid of anion-exchange chromatography using strongly basic Dowex 1-X8 anion-exchange resin. Performance of the chromatographic procedure was evaluated using various types of replacement anions for elution of mercury, including L-cysteine, thiourea, NO3-, and SO42-. A solution of 0.15% L-cysteine in 0.06 M HCl was found to be the most convenient eluent for subsequent MC-ICPMS measurements. The optimized procedure provides separation of Hg from virtually all concomitant matrix elements while maintaining quantitative (>95%) recovery. In addition, band displacement chromatographic experiments were conducted to assess whether the anion-exchange purification can produce Hg isotope fractionation artifacts. No isotope fractionation between the Hg(II)-L-cysteine complex in aqueous solution and Hg ions in the anion-exchange resin was observed. Hg isotope ratio measurements were performed using the bracketing standards approach and on-line correction for instrumental mass discrimination using Tl spiking and normalization to the Tl-205/Tl-203 ratio. The absence of spectral interference during Hg isotope ratio measurements was verified using a three-isotope plot. Uncertainties of Hg isotope ratio measurements for replication of the entire procedure, expressed as two standard deviations, are better than +/- 0.08 parts per thousand/amu. The described procedure facilitates study of variations in the isotopic composition of Hg in nature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据