4.5 Article

Development of a metabolomic approach based on urine samples and direct infusion mass spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 465, 期 -, 页码 20-27

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.07.016

关键词

Metabolomics; Urine; Direct infusion mass spectrometry; Ion suppression; Normalization; APP/PS1 mice

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTM2012-38720-C03-01]
  2. Consejeria de Innovacion, Ciencia y Empresa (Junta de Andalucia) [P012FQN-0442, P009-FQM-4659]
  3. Ministerio de Educacion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of urine by direct infusion mass spectrometry suffers from ion suppression due to its high salt content and inter-sample variability caused by the differences in urine volume between persons. Thus, urine metabolomics requires a careful selection of the sample preparation procedure and a normalization strategy to deal with these problems. Several approaches were tested for metabolomic analysis of urine samples by direct infusion electrospray mass spectrometry (DI-ESI-MS), including solid phase extraction, liquid liquid extraction, and sample dilution. In addition, normalization of results based on conductivity values and statistical treatment was performed to minimize sample variability. Both urine dilution and solid phase extraction with mixed mode sorbent considerably reduced the salt content in urine, providing comprehensive metabolomic fingerprints. Moreover, statistical data normalization enabled the correction of inter-sample physiological variability, improving the quality of results obtained. Therefore, high-throughput DI-ESI-MS fingerprinting of urine samples can be achieved with simple pretreatment procedures allowing the use of this noninvasive sampling in metabolomics. Finally, the optimized approach was tested in a pilot metabolomic investigation of urine samples from transgenic mice models of Alzheimer's disease (APP/PS1) in order to illustrate the potential of the methodology. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据