4.5 Article

RNA isolation from loquat and other recalcitrant woody plants with high quality and yield

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 452, 期 -, 页码 46-53

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.02.010

关键词

RNA isolation; Fruits; Polyphenols; Polysaccharides; Woody plants

资金

  1. Secretary of Higher Education, Science, Technology, and Innovation (SENESCYT)-Ecuador [006-IECE-SMG5-GPLR-2012]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation [A/8823/07, B/017931/08]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [BIO2011-29856-C02-02]
  4. European Funds for Regional Development (FEDER)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RNA isolation is difficult in plants that contain large amounts of polysaccharides and polyphenol compounds. To date, no commercial kit has been developed for the isolation of high-quality RNA from tissues with these characteristics, especially for fruit. The common protocols for RNA isolation are tedious and usually result in poor yields when applied to recalcitrant plant tissues. Here an efficient RNA isolation protocol based on cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (GAB) and two successive precipitations with 10 M lithium chloride (LiCl) was developed specifically for loquat fruits, but it was proved to work efficiently in other tissues of loquat and woody plants. The RNA isolated by this improved protocol was not only of high purity and integrity (A(260)/A(280) ratios ranged from 1.90 to 2.04 and A(260)/A(230) ratios were > 2.0) but also of high yield (up to 720 mu g on average [coefficient of variation = 21%] total RNA per gram fresh tissue). The protocol was tested on loquat fruit (different stages of development, postharvest, ripening, and bruising), leaf, root, flower, stem, and bud; quince fruit and root; grapevine cells in liquid culture; and rose petals. The RNA obtained with this method is amenable to enzymatic treatments and can be efficiently applied for research on gene characterization, expression, and function. (c) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据