4.5 Article

Liquid chromatography-diode array detection-mass spectrometry for compositional analysis of low molecular weight heparins

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 451, 期 -, 页码 35-41

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.02.005

关键词

LMWH; DAD; AMAC derivatization; ESI-MS; Compositional analysis

资金

  1. National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Significant New Drugs Development [2012ZX0950200-005]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB822102]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31000367]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2011CM038, ZR2010CM041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are important artificial preparations from heparin polysaccharide and are widely used as anticoagulant drugs. To analyze the structure and composition of LMWHs, identification and quantitation of their natural and modified building blocks are indispensable. We have established a novel reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry approach for compositional analysis of LMWHs. After being exhaustively digested and labeled with 2-aminoacridone, the structural motifs constructing LMWHs, including 17 components from dalteparin and 15 components from enoxaparin, were well separated, identified, and quantified. Besides the eight natural heparin disaccharides, many characteristic structures from dalteparin and enoxaparin, such as modified structures from the reducing end and nonreducing end, 3-O-sulfated tetrasaccharides, and trisaccharides, have been unambiguously identified based on their retention time and mass spectra. Compared with the traditional heparin compositional analysis methods, the approach described here is not only robust but also comprehensive because it is capable of identifying and quantifying nearly all components from lyase digests of LMWHs. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据