4.5 Article

Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in a large sample of Dutch nursing home patients with dementia

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gps.1722

关键词

dementia; neuropsychiatric symptoms; nursing home

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To estimate the prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia patients in Dutch nursing homes. Methods Cross-sectional study in a large sample of 1322 demented patients living in 59 dementia special care units (SCUs) in The Netherlands. Symptoms were observed by licensed vocational nurses during regular care-giving in a 2-week observational period prior to assessment. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing home version (NPI-NH; frequency X severity score > 4) and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI; symptoms occurring at least once a week). Results More than 80% of these patients suffered from at least one clinically significant symptom, as defined with the NPI-NH frequency X severity score >= 4. Measured with the NPH-NH agitation/aggression, apathy and irritability were the most frequently observed behaviors, with prevalences of 30-35%. Using the CMAI, 85% of the patients showed at least one symptom of agitation, of which general restlessness was observed most frequently (44%). Other frequently observed symptoms with prevalence rates of 30% were cursing or verbal aggression, constant request for attention, negativism, repetitious sentences, mannerisms, pacing, and complaining. Physically aggressive symptoms such as hitting, kicking, biting occurred less often (less than 13%). Conclusions Prevalence rates of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Dutch nursing home patients with dementia residing in SCUs are high, especially agitation and apathy. Insight into the prevalence rates of individual symptoms in patients with dementia has important practical consequences for the accurate planning of staff allotment and stresses the need for patient oriented care. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据