4.6 Article

A multivariate hybrid approach applied to AISI 52100 hardened steel turning optimization

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 189, 期 1-3, 页码 26-35

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.047

关键词

response surface methodology (RSM); principal component analysis (PCA); generalized reduced gradient (GRG); hard turning; mixed ceramic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an alternative hybrid approach, combining response surface methodology (RSM) and principal component analysis (PCA) to optimize multiple correlated responses in a turning process. Since a great number of manufacturing processes present sets of correlated responses, this approach could be extended to many applications. As a case study, the turning process of the AISI 52 100 hardened steel is examined considering three input factors: cutting speed (V-c), feed rate (f) and depth of cut (d). The outputs considered were: the mixed ceramic tool life (T), processing cost per piece (K-p), cutting time (C-t), the total turning cycle time (T-t), surface roughness (R-a) and the material removing rate (MRR). The aggregation of these targets into a single objective function is conducted using the score of the first principal component (PCl) of the responses' correlation matrix and the experimental region (Omega) is used as the main constraint of the problem. Considering that the first principal component cannot be enough to represent the original data set, a complementary constraint defined in terms of the second principal component score (PC2) is added. The original responses have the same weights and the multivariate optimization lead to the maximization of MRR while minimize the other outputs. The kind of optimization assumed by the multivariate objective function can be established examining the eigenvectors of the correlation matrix formed with the original outputs. The results indicate that the multiresponse optimization is achieved at a cutting speed of 238 m/min, with a feed rate of 0.08 mm/rev and at a depth of cut of 0.32 mm. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据