4.5 Article

Ultra-fast pg/ml anthrax toxin (protective antigen) detection assay based on microwave-accelerated metal-enhanced fluorescence

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 425, 期 1, 页码 54-61

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.02.040

关键词

Metal-enhanced fluorescence; Surface-enhanced fluorescence; Plasmon-enhanced fluorescence; Plasmon-controlled fluorescence; Point-of care diagnostics; Anthrax; Protective antigen (PA); Pathogen detection; Bio-warfare agent detection

资金

  1. Biological Defense Research Directorate, Naval Medical Research Center [00000123002]
  2. Institute of Fluorescence (IoF) at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County
  3. Les Baillie (Cardiff University, UK)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid presymptomatic diagnosis of Bacillus anthracis at early stages of infection plays a crucial role in prompt medical intervention to prevent rapid disease progression and accumulation of lethal levels of toxin. To detect low levels of the anthrax protective antigen (PA) exotoxin in biological fluids, we have developed a metal-enhanced fluorescence (MEF)-PA assay using a combination of the MEF effect and microwave-accelerated PA protein surface absorption. The assay is based on a modified version of our rapid catch and signal (RCS) technology previously designed for the ultra-fast and sensitive analysis of genomic DNA sequences. Technologically, the proposed MEF-PA assay uses standard 96-well plastic plates modified with silver island films (SiFs) grown within the wells. It is shown that the fluorescent probe, covalently attached to the secondary antibody, plays a crucial role of indicating complex formation (i.e., shows a strong MEF response to the recognition event). Microwave irradiation rapidly accelerates PA deposition onto the surface (rapid catch), significantly speeding up the MEF-PA assay and resulting in a total assay run time of less than 40 min with an analytical sensitivity of less than 1 pg/ml PA. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据