4.7 Article

TGF-β-induced transcriptional activation of MMP-2 is mediated by activating transcription factor (ATF)2 in human breast epithelial cells

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 252, 期 1, 页码 147-156

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.12.016

关键词

TGF-beta; MMP; p38 MAPK; ATF2; AP-1; breast epithelial cells

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously shown that transforming growth factor (TGF)-p up-regulates matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 leading to the induction of oncogenic signaling in preneoplastic MCF10A human breast epithelial cells. The present study investigated the mechanism of transcriptional regulation of MMP-2 by TGF-P in MCF10A cells. By using 5' deletion constructs of MMP-2 promoter, we demonstrated that binding sites for p53, S1, AP-1 and Sp1, and to a lesser extent CREB, GCN-His and PEA3, were potential cis-acting elements for TGF-p-induced transcriptional activation of MMP-2 in MCF10A cells. Since activating transcription factor (ATF)2 was shown to mediate the TGF-p-induced cellular responses, we examined the involvement of ATF2 in TGF-p-activated MMP-2 gene transcription. TGF-P increased DNA binding activity of AP-1 in which ATF2 was involved as evidenced by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. TGF-P induced phosphorylation of ATF2 through p38 MAPK signaling. A dominant-negative (DN) ATF2 significantly inhibited the TGF-p-induced up-regulation of MMP-2, but not that of MMP-9, suggesting that ATF2 may be a transcription factor responsible for transcriptional activation of MMP-2 gene by TGF-p. Invasive and migratory phenotypes induced by TGF-P were significantly inhibited by DN ATF2, indicating a critical role of ATF2 in TGF-p-induced oncogenic progression of MCF10A cells. Taken together, this study demonstrates that ATF2 mediates the TGF-p-induced MMP-2 transcriptional activation, elucidating a molecular mechanism for the malignant progression of human breast epithelial cells exerted by TGF-P. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据