4.2 Article

Abundance dynamics and sequence variation of neomycin phosphotransferase gene (nptII) homologs in river water

期刊

AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 131-140

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/ame048131

关键词

neomycin phosphotransferase gene; nptII; abundance dynamics; water samples; homologous sequence; real-time PCR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monitoring the abundance and dynamics of antibiotic resistance genes is essential for assessing their potential effects on environmental and human health. The objectives of the present study were to investigate: (1) the abundance of neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII) gene homologs in water samples collected monthly from the South Saskatchewan River (Canada) for 24 mo, and (2) sequence variation of the cloned nptII gene homologs retrieved from the river. DNA from river microbial communities was used to transform a natural competent Pseudomonas stutzeri strain containing a truncated nptII gene on a plasmid (P. stutzeri pMR7). Of the 24 water samples, the recovery of kanamycin resistant (Km(R)) transformants from DNA of 4 samples indicated the presence of nptII gene homologous sequences. However, the natural transformation process required similar to 3.2 x 10(4) copies of the nptII gene to recover a single KMR transformant. To overcome the limitation of detection, a real-time PCR assay using SYBR Green I was developed to quantify the abundance of nptII gene homologous sequences in river microbial communities. The results showed that nptII gene homologous sequences were present in the river, and their abundance varied over the course of this study, ranging from undetectable levels to 4.36 x 10(6) copies 1(-1) water. Furthermore, nptII gene homologous sequences amplified from river microbial community DNA were cloned, and unique clones were sequenced. Comparison of the nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the cloned fragments to those of the nptII gene on transposon Tn5 showed that they had over 96 % homology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据