4.7 Article

Emotional reactivity and emotion recognition in frontotemporal lobar degeneration

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 69, 期 2, 页码 148-155

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000265589.32060.d3

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P30 AG010129, AG17766, R37 AG017766, 1K08AG02076001, P01 AG019724-050002, P01-AG19724, P50 AG016570, AG10129, P01 AG019724, AG16570, P50-AG05142, P50 AG005142] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [T32 MH20006, T32 MH020006] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is associated with a profound decline in social and emotional behavior; however, current understanding regarding the specific aspects of emotional functioning that are preserved and disrupted is limited. Objective: To assess preservation of function and deficits in two aspects of emotional processing ( emotional reactivity and emotion recognition) in FTLD. Methods: Twenty-eight FTLD patients were compared with 16 controls in emotional reactivity (self-reported emotional experience, emotional facial behavior, and autonomic nervous system response to film stimuli) and emotion recognition ( ability to identify a target emotion of fear, happy, or sad experienced by film characters). Additionally, the neural correlates of emotional reactivity and emotion recognition were investigated. Results: FTLD patients were comparable to controls in 1) emotional reactivity to the fear, happy, and sad film clips and 2) emotion recognition for the happy film clip. However, FTLD patients were significantly impaired compared with controls in emotion recognition for the fear and sad film clips. Volumetric analyses revealed that deficits in emotion recognition were associated with decreased lobar volumes in the frontal and temporal lobes. Conclusions: The socioemotional decline typically seen in frontotemporal lobar degeneration patients may result more from an inability to process certain emotions in other people than from deficits in emotional reactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据