4.7 Article

Dust masses, PAH abundances, and starlight intensities in the SINGS galaxy sample

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 663, 期 2, 页码 866-894

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/518306

关键词

dust; extinction; galaxies : abundances; galaxies : general; galaxies : ISM; infrared : galaxies; ISM : general

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Physical dust models are presented for 65 galaxies in SINGS that are strongly detected in the four IRAC bands and three MIPS bands. For each galaxy we estimate ( 1) the total dust mass, ( 2) the fraction of the dust mass contributed by PAHs, and ( 3) the intensity of the starlight heating the dust grains. We find that spiral galaxies have dust properties resembling the dust in the local region of the MilkyWay, with similar dust- to- gas ratio and similar PAH abundance. The observed SEDs, including galaxies with SCUBA photometry, can be reproduced by dust models that do not require `` cold'' ( T less than or similar to 10 K) dust. The dust- to- gas ratio is observed to be dependent on metallicity. In the interstellar media of galaxies with A(O) equivalent to 12 + log(10)( O/ H) > 8: 1, grains contain a substantial fraction of interstellar Mg, Si, and Fe. Galaxies with AO < 8: 1 and extended H I envelopes in some cases appear to have global dust- to- gas ratios that are low for their measured oxygen abundance, but the dust- to- gas ratio in the regions where infrared emission is detected generally appears to be consistent with a substantial fraction of interstellar Mg, Si, and Fe being contained in dust. The PAH index qPAH, the fraction of the dust mass in the form of PAHs, correlates with metallicity. The nine galaxies in our sample with AO < 8: 1 have a median qPAH 1: 0%, whereas galaxies with AO > 8: 1 have a median qPAH 3: 55%. The derived dust masses favor a value XCO approximate to 4.1020 cm(-2) ( K km s(-1))(-1) for the CO- to- H-2 conversion factor. Except for some starbursting systems ( Mrk 33, Tol 89, NGC 3049), dust in the diffuse ISMdominates the IR power.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据