4.6 Article

Ceramide-1-phosphate binds group IVA cytosolic phospholipase a2 via a novel site in the C2 domain

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 282, 期 28, 页码 20467-20474

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M701396200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [1CO6 RR 17393, CA 117950] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 072925] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 52598, GM 53987, GM 68849] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously, ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P) was demonstrated to be a potent and specific activator of group IV cytosolic phospholipase A(2)alpha (cPLA(2)alpha) via interaction with the C2 domain. In this study, we hypothesized that the specific interaction site for C1P was localized to the cationic beta-groove (Arg(57), Lys(58), Arg(59)) of the C2 domain of cPLA(2)alpha. In this regard, mutants of this region of cPLA(2)alpha were generated (R57A/K58A/R59A, R57A/R59A, K58A/R59A, R57A/K58A, R57A, K58A, and R59A) and examined for C1P affinity by surface plasmon resonance. The triple mutants (R57A/K58A/R59A), the double mutants (R57A/R59A, K58A/R59A, and R57A/K58A), and the single mutant ( R59A) demonstrated significantly reduced affinity for C1P-containing vesicles as compared with wild-type cPLA(2)alpha. Examining these mutants for enzymatic activity demonstrated that these five mutants of cPLA(2)alpha also showed a significant reduction in the ability of C1P to: 1) increase the V-max of the reaction; and 2) significantly decrease the dissociation constant (K-s(A)) of the reaction as compared with the wild-type enzyme. The mutational effect was specific for C1P as all of the cationic mutants of cPLA(2)alpha demonstrated normal basal activity as well as normal affinities for phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate as compared with wild-type cPLA(2)alpha. This study, for the first time, demonstrates a novel C1P interaction site mapped to the cationic beta-groove of the C2 domain of cPLA(2)alpha.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据