4.7 Article

L576P KIT mutation in anal melanomas correlates with KIT protein expression and is sensitive to specific kinase inhibition

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 121, 期 2, 页码 257-264

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22681

关键词

melanoma; anal; mucosal; KIT; NRAS; BRAF mutations

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA047179, P30 CA008748, P01 CA064593] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [HL/DK55748] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activating mutations in either BRAF or NRAS are seen in a significant number of malignant melanomas, but their incidence appears to be dependent to ultraviolet light exposure. Thus, BRAF mutations have the highest incidence in non-chronic sun damaged (CSD), and are uncommon in acral, mucosal and CSD melanomas. More recently, activating KIT mutations have been described in rare cases of metastatic melanoma, without further reference to their clinical phenotypes. This finding is intriguing since KIT expression is downregulated in most melanomas progressing to more aggressive lesions. In this study, we investigated a group of anal melanomas for the presence of BRAF, NRAS, KIT and PDGFRA mutations. A heterozygous KIT exon 11 L576P substitution was identified in 3 of 20 cases tested. The 3 KIT mutation-carrying tumors were strongly immunopositive for KIT protein. No KIT mutations were-identified in tumors with less than 4+ KIT immunostaining. NRAS mutation was identified in one tumor. No BRAF or PDGFRA mutations were identified in either KIT positive or negative anal melanomas. In vitro drug testing of stable transformant Ba/F3 KITL576P mutant cells showed sensitivity for dasatinib (previously known as BMS-354825), a dual SRC/ABL kinase inhibitor, and imatinib. However, compared to an imatinib-sensitive KIT mutant dasatinib was potent at lower doses than imatinib in the KITL76P mutant. These results suggest that a subset of anal melanomas show activating KIT mutations, which are susceptible for therapy with specific kinase inhibitors. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, hic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据