4.2 Article

Assessing parental attitudes toward genetic testing for childhood hearing loss: Before and after genetic consultation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 143A, 期 14, 页码 1546-1553

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31730

关键词

genetic testing; childhood hearing loss; parental beliefs and attitude

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on the development of a Genetic Attitude Assessment Tool (GAAT) to measure parental attitudes in contemplating genetic testing for childhood hearing loss, and to examine the differences in assessments made before and after genetic counseling. The GAAT tool was administered to a convenient sample of 119 parents of children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The respondents completed the survey either before (n = 77) or after (n = 42) genetic counseling. Exploratory Factor Analysis was applied to identify and quantify the Underlying psychosocial structure. Our results showed the validated 54-item GAAT instrument contains six subscales: (1) test intention, (2) beliefs in non-genetic causes of hearing loss, (3) deferral of decision to undergo genetic testing, (4) appropriate use of genetic testing results, (5) beliefs in the benefits, and (6) concerns about stigma. The respondents who answered the survey after genetic counseling had higher test intention (P = 0.017) and endorsed to a greater extent beliefs in the benefits (P < 0.001). They believed to a lesser extent that childhood hearing loss was clue to non-genetic causes (P < 0.001) and were less inclined to prefer decision deferral (P = 0.031). Respondents who themselves had a hearing loss expressed a significantly weaker belief in non-genetic causes of hearing loss (P < 0.0001). In conclusion the validated GAAT instrument is responsive to changes in parental attitudes after genetic counseling, The GAAT may be Used to monitor parental attitudes serially, to further understand how parental attinides change from pre genetic counseling, post genetic counseling, to post test result disclosure. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据