4.5 Article

Development of a novel method for triterpenoidal saponins in rat plasma by solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 419, 期 2, 页码 323-332

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.08.045

关键词

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; Multiswitching monitoring mode; Solid-phase extraction; Triterpenoidal saponins; Pulsatilla chinensis; Pharmacokinetics

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province-CSPC Pharmaceutical, China [C2011206167]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) has been developed for the quantification of four triterpenoidal saponins (anemoside 84, pulsatilloside B, anemoside A3, and 23-hydroxybetulinic acid) in rat plasma following solid-phase extraction (SPE). The optimized procedure utilized off-line extraction of the analytes from plasma using polymeric (Strata-X) SPE cartridges. Detection and quantitation were performed by MS/MS using electrospray ionization (ESI) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in a novel multiswitching monitoring mode. The analytes and internal standard (scutellarin) were analyzed using a Sapphire C18 column (250 x 4.6 mm, 5 mu m) with a linear gradient elution. The mass transition ion pairs of the triterpenoidal saponins were executed as follows: m/z 1219.7/749.4 for anemoside B4, m/z 819.4/347.2 for pulsatilloside B, m/z 749.6/471.2 for anemoside A3, m/z 471.4/471.4 for 23-hydroxybetulinic acid, and m/z 461.1/285.0 for the internal standard. The specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, recovery, matrix effect, and stabilities were validated for all analytes in the plasma samples. In conclusion, the validation results demonstrate that this method is robust and specific. This validated method is a novel technique for sample preparation and quantitation and was successfully applied to estimate the pharmacokinetics of triterpenoidal saponins. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据