4.5 Article

The role and characterization of phospholipase A1 in mediating lysophosphatidylcholine synthesis in Trypanosoma brucei

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 405, 期 -, 页码 319-329

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20070193

关键词

interfacial activation; lipid metabolism; lysophosphatidylcholine; phospholipase; Trypanosoma brucei

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lysophospholipids are ubiquitous intermediates in a variety of metabolic and signalling pathways in eukaryotic cells. We have reported recently that lysoglycerophosphatidylcholine (lyso-GPCho) synthesis in the insect form of the ancient eukaryote Trypanosoma brucei is mediated by a novel phospholipase A, (TbPLA(1)). In the present study, we show that despite equal levels of TbPLA(1) gene expression in wild-type insect and bloodstream trypomastigotes, both TbPLA(1) enzyme levels and lysoGPCho metabolites are approx. 3-fold higher in the bloodstream form. Both of these parasite stages synthesize identical molecular species of lysoGPCho. TbPLA(1) null mutants in the bloodstream form of the parasite are viable, but are deficient in lysoGPCho synthesis, a defect that can be overcome by the expression of an ectopic copy of TbPLA(1). The biochemical attributes of TbPLA(1)(-) mediated lysoGPCho synthesis were examined in vitro using recombinant TbPLA(1). Although TbPLA(1) possesses an active-site serine residue, it is insensitive to serine-modifying reagents, such as di-isopropyl fluorophosphate and PMSF, a characteristic shared by lipases that possess lid-sheltered catalytic triads. TbPLA(1) does not require metal co-factors for activity, but it does require interfacial activation prior to catalysis. Results from size-exclusion chromatography and binding kinetics analysis revealed that TbPLA(1) activation by Triton X-100/GPCho mixed micelle surfaces was not specific and did not require the pre-formation of a specific enzyme-substrate complex to achieve surface binding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据