4.8 Article

Genome-wide patterns of single-feature polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705323104

关键词

evolutionary genomics; gene array; nucleoticle diversity

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [5 F32 GM068381, F32 GM068381, R01 GM067837, GM62932, R01 GM056006, R01GM073822, R01 GM062932, R37 GM067837, GM56006, R01 GM073822, GM67837] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used hybridization to the ATH1 gene expression array to interrogate genomic DNA diversity in 23 wild strains (accessions) of Arabidopsis thaliana (arabidopsis), in comparison with the reference strain Columbia (Col). At <1% false discovery rate, we detected 77,420 single-feature polymorphisms (SFPs) with distinct patterns of variation across the genome. Total and pair-wise diversity was higher near the centrorneres and the heterochromatic knob region, but overall diversity was positively correlated with recombination rate (R-2 = 3.1%). The difference between total and pair-wise SFP diversity is a relative measure contrasting diversifying or frequency-dependent selection, similar to Tajima's D, and can be calibrated by the empirical genome-wide distribution. Each unique locus, centered on a gene, has a diversity and selection score that suggest a relative role in past evolutionary processes. Homologs of disease resistance (R) genes include members with especially high levels of diversity often showing frequency-dependent selection and occasionally evidence of a past selective sweep. Receptor-like and S-locus proteins also contained members with elevated levels of diversity and signatures of selection, whereas other gene families, bHLH, F-box, and RING finger proteins, showed more typical levels of diversity. SFPs identified with the gene expression array also provide an empirical hybridization polymorphism background for studies of gene expression polymorphism and are available through the genome browser http:// signal.salk.edu/cgi-bin/AtSFP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据