4.5 Article

Integrated microfluidic reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for rapid detection of food- or waterborne pathogenic rotavirus

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 415, 期 2, 页码 87-96

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.04.026

关键词

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR); Microfluidics; Online fluorescence detection; Rotavirus

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61072030, 30700155]
  2. NSFC-Guangdong Joint Funds of China [U0931005]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0829]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of microfluidic tools for nucleic acid analysis has become a burgeoning area of research during the postgenome era. Here we have developed a microfluidic device that integrates reverse transcription (RT) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with online fluorescence detection to realize a rapid detection system for performing both genetic amplification and product analysis. The microfluidic device mainly comprises a grooved copper heating block for RT and a heated cylinder for amplification. To expedite the analysis process, we combined the continuous-flow PCR with an online fluorescence detection system that allows analysis of amplification products within 1 min. Rotaviruses are worldwide enteric pathogens in humans and animals responsible for a significant burden of disease through person-to-person transmission and exposure to contaminated foods and water. In this study, rotavirus from stool specimens was successfully amplified and detected using the RT-PCR microfluidic system within 1 h, and the limit of detection of the RNA concentration was estimated to be 3.6 x 10(4) copies mu l(-1). Compared with a large-scale apparatus, the integrated microfluidic system presented here can perform rapid nucleic acid amplification and analysis, possibly making it a crucial platform for future diagnosis application. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据