4.5 Article

Differences in metabolite profile between blood plasma and serum

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 406, 期 2, 页码 105-112

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.07.015

关键词

Plasma; Serum; Metabolomics; Gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry; Principal components analysis

资金

  1. National Key New Drug Creation Special Programs [2009ZX09304-001, 2009ZX09502-004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of the People's Republic of China [30630076]
  3. Jiangsu Province Social Development Foundation [BE2008673]
  4. National 11th 5-Year Technology Supporting Program of the People's Republic of China [2006BA108B04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In metabolomic research, blood plasma and serum have been considered to possess similar compositions and properties. Their perceived equivalence has resulted in researchers choosing arbitrarily between serum and plasma for analysis. Here, routine serum and plasma were prepared and their low-molecular-weight compounds were determined using gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Principal components analysis was applied to process the acquired data, and marked differences in metabolite profiles were observed between serum and plasma. Of the 72 identified compounds, 36 (50%) discriminate serum from plasma, with 29 and 7 metabolites showing a significantly higher abundance (t test, P < 0.05) in serum and plasma, respectively. Incubation of blood had distinct effects on the analyte peak areas, with the effects being more pronounced for plasma than for serum and more pronounced for a shorter incubation than for a longer incubation. These results highlight the importance in choosing serum or plasma as the analytical sample and in stipulating the incubation time. Because incubation affected the analyte peak areas less in serum than in plasma, we recommend serum as the sample of choice in metabolomic studies. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据