4.7 Article

Anti-fouling ultrafiltration membranes containing polyacrylonitrile-graft-poly (ethylene oxide) comb copolymer additives

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 298, 期 1-2, 页码 136-146

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.04.011

关键词

ultratiltration; fouling; polymer brush; surface modification; polyethylene oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane fouling is one of the most important challenges faced in membrane ultrafiltration (UF) operations. In this study, polyacrylonitrile-graftpoly(ethylene oxide) (PAN-g-PEO), an amphiphilic comb copolymer with a water-insoluble polyacrylonitrile (PAN) backbone and hydrophilic poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) side chains, was used as an additive in the manufacture of novel PAN UF membranes. During casting, the PAN-g-PEO additive segregates to form a PEO brush layer on all membrane surfaces, including internal pores. Wettability, pure water permeability, and resistance to irreversible fouling increased when either the amount of PAN-g-PEO added to the membrane or the PEO content of the comb copolymer was increased. These trends were consistent with measured adhesion forces between the membranes and a carboxylated latex particle probe in an atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis, and with the near-surface PEO coverage as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed further effects of additive incorporation on membrane morphology. In 24-h dead-end filtration studies, blend membranes prepared with 20 wt% PAN-g-PEO (comb PEO content: 39 wt%) were found to resist irreversible fouling by 1000 ppm solutions of bovine serum albumin (BSA), sodium alginate, and humic acid, recovering the initial pure water flux completely by a pure water rinse, or a backwash in the case of humic acid. This exceptional anti-fouling performance holds promise for extending UF membrane lifetimes without need for aggressive cleaning procedures. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据