4.5 Article

Development of diagnostics in the search for an explanation of aerotoxic syndrome

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 404, 期 1, 页码 64-74

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.04.032

关键词

CBDP; Butyrylcholinesterase; Serum albumin; Tyrosine; Organophosphorus agent; Mass spectrometry; Aerotoxic syndrome

资金

  1. U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command [W81XWH-07-2-0034]
  2. National Institutes of Health [U01 NS058056, P30CA36727, R01 ES09883, P42ES04696]
  3. pilot unions
  4. flight attendant unions
  5. Royal Australian Air Force, the Norwegian Union of Energy Workers (SAFE)
  6. NYCO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aerotoxic syndrome is assumed to be caused by exposure to tricresyl phosphate, an additive in engine lubricants and hydraulic fluids that is activated to the toxic 2-(ortho-cresyl)-4H-1,3,2-benzodioxaphosphoran-2-one (CBDP). Currently, there is no laboratory evidence to support intoxication of airline crew members by CBDP. Our goal was to develop methods for testing in vivo exposure by identifying and characterizing biomarkers. Mass spectrometry was used to study the reaction of CBDP with human albumin, free tyrosine, and human butyrylcholinesterase. Human albumin made a covalent bond with CBDP, adding a mass of 170 amu to Tyr411 to yield the o-cresyl phosphotyrosine derivative. Human butyrylcholinesterase made a covalent bond with CBDP on Ser198 to yield five adducts with added masses of 80, 108, 156, 170, and 186 amu. The most abundant adduct had an added mass of 80 amu from phosphate (HPO(3)), a surprising result given that no pesticide or nerve agent is known to yield phosphorylated serine with an added mass of 80 amu. The next most abundant adduct had an added mass of 170 amu to form o-cresyl phosphoserine. It is concluded that toxic gases or oil mists in cabin air may form adducts on plasma butyrylcholinesterase and albumin, detectable by mass spectrometry. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据