4.7 Article

Elevated [18F]fluorodopamine turnover in brain of patients with schizophrenia:: An [18F]fluorodopa/positron emission tomography study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 27, 期 30, 页码 8080-8087

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0805-07.2007

关键词

FDOPA; PET; schizophrenia; dopamine; turnover; steady-state storage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous positron emission tomography (PET) studies with levodopa analogs have revealed a modestly increased capacity for dopamine synthesis in the striatum of patients with schizophrenia compared with healthy age-matched control subjects. We hypothesized that not just the synthesis but also the turnover of radiolabeled dopamine is elevated in patients. To test the hypothesis, we reanalyzed 2-h-long [F-18]fluorodopa (FDOPA)/PET recordings from eight unmedicated patients with schizophrenia and 15 healthy age-matched control subjects, using new methods for the quantification of [F-18]fluorodopamine steady-state kinetics. The fractional rate constant for the catabolism and elimination of [F-18]fluorodopamine was elevated nearly twofold in striatum, the largest biochemical difference in brain of schizophrenics yet reported. The magnitude of the intrinsic blood-brain FDOPA clearance with correction for this loss of [F-18]fluorodopamine metabolites was increased by 20% in caudate and putamen and by 50% in amygdala and midbrain of the patients. However, the magnitude of the steady-state storage of FDOPA and its decarboxylated metabolites (V-d) was reduced by one-third in the caudate nucleus and amygdala of the schizophrenic group. Thus, reduced steady-state storage of [F-18]fluorodopamine occurs in the midst of accelerated synthesis in brain of untreated patients. Positive scores of the positive and negative syndrome scale correlated inversely with the magnitude of V-d in amygdala, suggesting an association between positive symptoms and impaired steady-state storage of FDOPA metabolites in that structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据