4.6 Article

Pre-hospital detection of acute myocardial infarction with ultra-rapid human fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) immunoassay

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 119, 期 3, 页码 349-354

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.09.003

关键词

Myocardial infarction; Coronary disease; Biomarkers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a portable semi-quantitative whole blood immunoassay measuring soluble human fatty acid-binding protein [H-FABP] (CardioDetect (R)) for the pre-hospital detection of myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and results: We enrolled prospectively 108 consecutive patients with acute ischemic type chest pain in whom the first medical care was delivered by a mobile intensive care unit (MICU). CTnI, myoglobin, CK-MB and CardioDetect (R) were first assessed in the MICU before hospital admission using point-of-care assays and then cTnI was serially measured during the hospital stay. MI was defined as a positive cTnI in any sample over the first 24 h. The vast majority of the patients (77/108) were admitted <3 h of symptoms onset. Pre-hospital cTnI sample was normal in 96 patients (88.9%) of whom 43 had subsequent cTnI elevation. A positive H-FABP using the CardioDetect (R) assay had a significantly better sensitivity than cTnI, myoglobin and CK-MB (87.3% vs 21.8%, 64.2% and 41.5%, respectively) to identify MI. The significant better sensitivity of the CardioDetect (R) assay was also observed among patients who presented <3 h of symptom onset. The specificity of the CardioDetect r assay was significantly better than that of myoglobin, irrespective of the time delay from symptom onset to measurement. In patients with normal pre-hospital cTnI and no ST-elevation (n=63), assessment based only on a positive H-FABP had 83.3% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity for the diagnosis of an evolving MI. Conclusion: Early assessment of H-FABP in patients presenting with chest pain improves the diagnosis of ongoing MI. (C) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据