4.8 Article

Norepinephrine increases the pathogenic potential of Campylobacter jejuni

期刊

GUT
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 1060-1065

出版社

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2006.114926

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D012708/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G9721484] Funding Source: Medline
  3. BBSRC [BB/D012708/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [G9721484] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D012708/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G9721484] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Campylobacter jejuni can cause a spectrum of diseases in humans, ranging from enteritis and diarrhoea to severe inflammation, profuse bloody diarrhoea and chronic relapsing infection. Norepinephrine (NE) levels in the intestine increase under conditions of stress and trauma, and are thought to result in spill over of NE into the intestinal lumen. NE is known to stimulate the growth of a range of bacterial species, and to increase the pathogenicity of Escherichia coli. Aim: To determine the effects of NE on the pathogenic potential of C jejuni in a model system. Methods: C jejuni was grown in iron-replete and iron-limited media in the presence and absence of 100 mu M NE. Several virulence-associated characteristics, including motility and cell invasion, were measured. Results: When C jejuni was grown in iron-limited media in the presence of NE, growth rate, motility and invasion of cultured epithelial cells were increased compared with cultures grown in the absence of NE. Bacteria exposed to NE during growth also caused greater subsequent disruption of cultured epithelial cell monolayers, inducing widespread breakdown of tight junctions. Conclusion: Exposure to NE causes an increase in the virulence-associated properties of Campylobacter. Stress and concomitant infection could therefore be contributory factors to the variable presentation of this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据