4.5 Article

Development of an O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase assay based on covalent transfer of the benzyl moiety from [benzene-3H]O6-benzylguanine to the protein

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 383, 期 1, 页码 44-51

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.08.009

关键词

O-6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase assay; [Benzene-H-3]O-6-benzylguanine; Cloretazine; Carmustine; Temozolomide; AGT-positive and -negative cells; B16F10 melanoma; Drug binding to melanin

资金

  1. U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) [CA-090671, CA-122112, CA-129186]
  2. National Cancer Institute
  3. National Foundation for Cancer Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although it is known that (i) O-6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) confers tumor cell resistance to guanine O-6-targeting drugs such as cloretazine, carmustine, and temozolomide and that (ii) AGT levels in tumors are highly variable, measurement of AGT activity in tumors before treatment is not a routine clinical practice. This derives in part from the lack of a reliable clinical AGT assay; therefore, a simple AGT assay was devised based on transfer of radioactive benzyl residues from [benzene-(3) H]O-6-benzylguanine ([(3)HIBG) to AGT. The assay involves incubation of intact cells or cell homogenates with [H-3]BG and measurement of radioactivity in a 70% methanol precipitable fraction. Approximately 85% of AGT in intact cells was recovered in cell homogenates. Accuracy of the AGT assay was confirmed by examination of AGT levels by Western blot analysis with the exception of false-positive results in melanin-containing cells due to [H-3]BG binding to melanin. Second-order kinetic constants for human and murine AGT were 1100 and 380M(-1) s(-1), respectively. AGT levels in various human cell lines ranged from less than 500 molecules/cell (detection limit) to 45,000 molecules/cell. Rodent cell lines frequently lacked AGT expression, and AGT levels in rodent cells Were much lower than in human cells. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据